🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.